Saturday, October 20, 2012

Obamacare Wielded as Anti Religion “Cultural Bulldozer”

From National Review Online:
Some might dismiss these employers’ concerns because birth control is hardly controversial outside of orthodox religious circles. But these birth control cases are stalking horses for far more intrusive violations of religious liberty to come, e.g., requiring businesses to provide free abortions to their employees. Consider the Democratic party’s 2012 platform:
The Democratic party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman’s right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay. [Emphasis added.]
If Democrats regain the control of Congress and the presidency they enjoyed in 2009 and 2010, look for the Affordable Care Act to be amended consistent with their platform. After that, it won’t take long for HHS to promulgate a free abortion rule along lines similar to the free birth control mandate.

More thoughts on Election 2012

Included in the St. Joan of Arc Knights of Columbus (Arvada, Colorado), November 2012 Newsletter:

Vote Pro-life, Pro-family, Pro-Freedom of Religion
Four generations -- We're all for pro-life (Summer, 2010)
With the 2012 election only days away, we need to be reminding friends and family to vote, and vote pro-life, pro-family, and pro-Bill of Rights freedoms. Perhaps we ourselves need to be reminded often of the Bill of Rights to the United States Constitution, especially the First:
Amendment I. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Read those first two phrases of the First Amendment again. Not only is the government forbidden to recognize the priority of any religion, neither is it to inhibit its free exercise. Yet the Health and Human Services (HSS) Department of the Federal Government is requiring employers to provide contraception, sterilization, and hormonally induced abortions at no charge to employees. There is no religious exemption under the new rule, except for individual churches and their employees who are responsible only for religious services. Catholic schools, hospitals, and nursing homes are not exempt. Neither are faithful Catholic employers, from officers of insurance companies to plumbing company owners. This rule violates the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church and the conscience of faithful Catholics, whether employed by the Church or private employers. Even many other Christian churches are also threatened by this rule.
For much too long states have been allowing virtually all abortions and even financing some of them, as well as providing contraceptives and sterilization for Medicaid clients. Now the Federal government is compelling and expanding such “services” under the HHS mandate.
There is an increasing threat to natural marriage as well, which could become stronger in the next few years. Marriage is a faithful union of one man and one woman from the beginning of recorded history. To recognize same-sex unions is unnatural and inconsistent with God’s plan for human kind.
These anti-life, anti-family, anti-religion policies need to end. State and federal government agencies should be nurturing and protecting new life rather that ending it before birth. Pro-life health services from pre-conception through delivery and post natal are essential for low to middle income families.
The right to life is the first natural right which every newly conceived person acquires from God. This right supersedes political parties and union interests. The pro-death, anti-religion culture is attempting to expand its hold on American culture through the upcoming election. We cannot let this happen.
Deacon Rex Pilger
St. Joan of Arc Church
Arvada, Colorado

Saturday, September 29, 2012

Catholics and Election 2012

In the past eight decades, Christians, especially Catholic Christians, have been repeatedly challenged by changes in American society that are opposed to both the laws of nature and the  divinely law revealed in the Old and New Testaments. Dismal milestones along the journey into what Pope John Paul II termed a “culture o f death” include: · Non-Catholic churches begin “acceptance” of contraceptives in the 1930’s and especially birth control pills in the 1960’s,
· Country-wide legalized abortion begins in 1973 (Roe versus Wade)
· Embryonic stem cell research begins in the 1990’s
· Assisted suicide is legalized in some states in recent years
· Euthanasia is legalized in some Europe countries
Each has corrupted society progressively, in our country, and throughout much of the Western world; further, Western countries, via taxes of their own citizens, provide“aid” to developing countries which includes contraceptives. Over this same period of time, our society has weakened protection of traditional marriage, beginning with “no-fault” divorce laws in the 1960’s and 1970’s, legalized “gay marriage” in some states, and even now we hear disturbing voices which advocate legalized incest and polygamy. If all this were not enough, the freedom to practice religion is now under threat with the Department of Health and Human Services’ mandate, a requirement under law, as part of “Obamacare,” that all employers are compelled to provide employees with insurance   that covers contraception, sterilization, and drug-induced abortion at no cost (not even a co-pay) to the employees. By defining such drugs and procedures as “health care,” which increases the cost of insurance to all, more importantly, such “care” violates the conscience and deepest beliefs of Catholics and many other Christians. Pregnancy is, after all, not an illness. The unborn is a distinct human being and has his or her own right to life from the moment of conception. (Of course, pre-natal and post-natal care of new mothers should be part of any comprehensive health insurance plan.)
Faithful Catholics are obligated to follow Church teaching on life and family issues, and consider their importance in voting for candidates, in local, state, and national elections. As voters (an obligation), we Catholics are to have formed our consciences in conformity with Church teaching so as to cast our vote for those candidates who are “pro-life” and “pro-traditional family” over candidates who are“pro-choice and inclusive” when it comes to, first, abortion, euthanasia and assisted suicide, and, second, “pro-traditional marriage versus “pro-gay marriage.” The right to life of yet unborn children is the first human right, taking priority over other issues. Additionally, traditional marriage, of one man and one woman, is also a fundamental human right, complementing the right to life. Further, there is the additional concern regarding freedom of religion, a right recognized in the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution, which is threatened by the HHS mandate.
In preparing for election this November, we Catholics are to study the platforms and pray over the  candidates for each elected office. Then, we are obligated to vote for those candidates who are best positioned to produce legislation which will protect the unborn and their mothers, the elderly and handicapped from euthanasia, and the mentally afflicted from assisted suicide. We are also to take protection of traditional marriage into account. Ideally, the pro-life and pro-marriage candidate will also be committed to serving the poor and immigrants, the hungry and the homeless, will be opposed to the death penalty, and support bills which will restore fiscal responsibility, encourage economic growth, provide stability in funding social security and medical care of the elderly, veterans, and the disabled, and prudential national security. Do such ideal candidates exist? Probably not, and, chances are that Catholics can disagree about how to accomplish these
goals. Nevertheless, the first human right, that of life, must take priority over other issues when it comes to deciding how to vote. After all, if life is taken from a person before birth, that girl or boy cannot exercise any other rights. If we keep this principle in mind, it might help us to see more clearly the other moral dimensions of public life and the reason for Church teaching.
Let us seek and pray that we vote in accord with a fully-formed Catholic conscience, for those who will protect the unborn, the elderly, and the poor, to their maximum capabilities and will preserve religious liberty. Let us ask the intercession of St. Joan of Arc, St. Thomas More, and St. Louis IX, each of whom fought the good fight, that this country may once again be a beacon of freedom and life, and that we in our own time will triumph over the shadows of darkness and death which penetrate all too deeply into our culture, our parishes, and our families. Let us also ask the Lord, in the power of the Holy Spirit, to draw those who have been caught up in the deathly vocations, to seek the light of his forgiveness, leave the abortion clinics behind, and be fully reconciled with him and the Father, who live forever and ever. Amen.
Rev. Joseph T. Cao
Deacon Rex H. Pilger, Jr.
St. Joan of Arc Catholic Church
Arvada, Colorado
For more information on Catholic teaching on these issues, please visit these websites:
· United States Conference of Catholic Bishops,
· Colorado Catholic Conference,
· Archdiocese of Denver,

Original published as an insert into the weekly St. Joan of Arc bulletin, September 23, 2012

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Ad Pascendum - English Translation

Below is a translation of Ad Pascendum, obtained via

Apostolic Letter Containing Norms

for the Order of Diaconate

Paul VI

Ad Pascendum
15 August, 1972

For the nurturing and constant growth of the people of God, Christ the Lord instituted in the Church a variety of ministries, which work for the good of the whole body.1
From the apostolic age the diaconate has had a clearly outstanding position among these ministries, and it has always been held in great honour by the Church. Explicit testimony of this is given by the Apostle Paul both in his letter to the Philippians, in which he sends his greetings not only to the bishops but also to the deacons,2 and in a letter to Timothy, in which he illustrates the qualities and virtues that deacons must have in order to be worthy of their ministry.3
Later, when the early writers of the Church acclaim the dignity of deacons, they do not fall to extol also the spiritual qualities and virtues that are required for the performance of that ministry, namely. fidelity to Christ moral integrity, and obedience to the bishop.
St. Ignatius of Antioch declares that the office of the deacon is nothing other than "the ministry of Jesus Christ, who was with the Father before all ages and has been manifested in the final time."4 He also made the following observation: "The deacons too, who are ministers of the mysteries of Jesus Christ should please all in every way; for they are not servants of food and drink, but ministers of the Church of God."5
St. Polycarp of Smyna exhorts deacons to "be moderate in all things, merciful, diligent, living according to the truth of the Lord, who became the servant of all."6 The author of the Didascalia Apostolorum, recalling the words of Christ, "Anyone who wants to be great among you must he your servant,"7 addresses the following fraternal exhortation to deacons: "Accordingly you deacons also should behave in such a way that, if your ministry obliges you to lay down your lives for a brother, you should do so. . . If the Lord of heaven and earth served us and suffered and sustained everything on our behalf, should not this be done for our brothers all the more by us, since we are imitators of him and have been given the place of Christ?"8


Furthermore, when the writers of the first centuries insist on the importance of the ministry of deacons, they give many examples of the manifold important tasks entrusted to them, and clearly show how much authority they held in the Christian communities and how great was their contribution to the apostate. The deacon is described as "the bishop's ear, mouth, heart and soul."9 The deacon is at the disposal of the bishop in order that he may serve the whole people of God and take care of the sick and the poor;10 he is correctly and rightly called "one who shows love for orphans, for the devout and for the widowed, one who is fervent in spirit, one who shows love for what is good."11 Furthermore, he is entrusted with the mission of taking the holy Eucharist to the sick confined to their homes,12 of conferring baptism,13and or attending to preaching the Word of God in accordance with the express will of the bishop.
Accordingly, the diaconate flourished in a wonderful way in the Church, and at the same time gave an outstanding witness of love for Christ and the brethren through the performance of works of charity,14 the celebration of sacred rites,15 and the fulfilment of pastoral duties.16


The exercise of the office of deacon enabled those who were to become priests to give proof of themselves, to display the merit of their work, and to acquire preparation -- all of which were requirements for receiving the dignity of the priesthood and the office of pastor.
As time went on, the discipline concerning this sacred order was changed. The prohibition against conferring ordination without observing the established sequence of orders was strengthened, and there was a gradual decrease in the number of those who preferred to remain deacons all their lives instead of advancing to a higher order. As a consequence the permanent diaconate almost entirely disappeared in the Latin Church. It is scarcely the place to mention the decrees of the Council of Trent proposing to restore the sacred orders in accordance with their own nature as ancient functions within the Church;17 it was much later that the idea matured of restoring this important sacred order also as a truly permanent rank. Our predecessor Pius XII briefly alluded to this matter.18 Finally. the Second Vatican Council supported the wishes and requests that, where such would lead to the good of souls, the permanent diaconate should be restored as an intermediate order between the higher ranks of the Church's hierarchy and the rest of the people of God, as an expression of the needs desires of the Christian communities, as a driving force for the Church's service or diaconia towards the local Christian communities, and as a sign or sacrament of the Lord Christ himself, who "came not to be served but to serve."19


For this reason, at the third session of the Council, in October 1964, the Fathers ratified the principle of the renewal of the diaconate, and the following November the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, Lumen Gentium, was promulgated. In the 19th article of this document a description is given of the principal characteristics proper to that state. "At a lower level of the hierarchy are deacons, who receive the imposition of hands 'not unto the priesthood. but unto the ministry.' For strengthened by sacramental race they are dedicated to the people of God, in conjunction with the bishop and his body of priests, in the service of the liturgy, of the Gospel, and of works of charity."20
The same constitution made the following declaration about permanency in the rank of deacon "These duties (of deacons), so very necessary for the life of the Church, can In many areas be fulfilled only with difficulty according to the prevailing discipline of the Latin Church. For this reason, the diaconate car in the future be restored as a proper and permanent rank of the hierarchy."21


However, this restoration of the permanent diaconate required that the instructions of the Council be more profoundly examined and that there be mature deliberation concerning juridical status both of the celibate and married deacon Similarly it was necessary that matters connected with the diaconate of those who are to become priests should be adapted to contemporary conditions, so that the hire of diaconate would furnish that proof of life, of ministry and of aptitude for the priestly ministry, which ancient disciples demanded from candidates for the priesthood.
Thus on 18 June 1967 we issued in motu proprio form, the Apostolic Letter Sacrum Diaconatus Ordinem, by which suitable canonical norms for the permanent diaconate were established.22 On June 17 of the following year, through the Apostolic Constitution Pontificalis Romani Recognitio,23we authorised the new rite for the conferring of the sacred orders of diaconate, priesthood and episcopacy, and at the same time defined the matter and the form of the ordination itself.
Now that we are proceeding further and are today promulgating the Apostolic Letter Ministeria Quaedam, we consider it fining to issue certain norms concerning the diaconate. We also desire that candidates for the diaconate should know what ministries they are to exercise before sacred ordination and when and how they are to take upon themselves the responsibilities of celibacy and liturgical prayer.
Since entrance into the clerical state is deferred until diaconate, there no longer exists the rite of first tonsure, by which a layman used to become a cleric. But a new rite is introduced, by which one who aspires to the diaconate or priesthood publicly manifests his will to offer himself to God and the Church, so that he may exercise a sacred order. The Church, accepting this offering, selects and calls him to prepare himself to receive a sacred order, and in this way he is properly numbered among candidates for the diaconate or priesthood.
It is especially fitting that the ministries of lector and acolyte should be entrusted to those who, as candidates for the order of diaconate or priesthood, desire to devote themselves to God and to the Church in a special way. For the Church, which "does not cease to take the bread of life from the table of the word of God and the body of Christ and offer it to the faithful,"24 considers it to be very opportune that both by study and by gradual exercise of the ministry of the word and of the altar, candidates for sacred orders should through intimate contact understand and reflect upon the double aspect of the priestly office. Thus it comes about that the authenticity of the ministry shines out with the greatest effectiveness. In this way the candidates accede to sacred orders fully aware of their vocation. fervent in spirit serving the Lord, constant in prayer and aware of the needs of the faithful.25


Having weighed every aspect of the question well, having sought the opinion of experts, having consulted with the episcopal conferences and taken their views into account and having taken council with our Venerable Brothers who are members of the Sacred Congregations competent in this matter. by our apostolic authority we enact the following norms, derogating--if and insofar as necessary--from provisions of the Code of Canon Law until now in force, and we promulgate them with this letter.
1. (a) A rite of admission for candidates to the diaconate and to the priesthood is introduced. In order that this admission be properly made, the free petition of the aspirant made out and signed in his own hand, is required. as well as the written acceptance of the competent ecclesiastical superior, by which the selection by the church is brought about.
Professed members of clerical congregations who seek the priesthood are not bound to this rite.
(b) The competent superior for this acceptance is the ordinary (the bishop and, in clerical institutes of perfection, the major superior). Those can be accepted who give signs of an authentic vocation and, endowed with good moral qualifies and free from mental and physical defects, wish to dedicate their lives to the service of the Church for the glory of God and the good of souls. It is necessary that those who aspire to the transitional diaconate will have completed at least their twentieth year and have begun their course of theological studies.
(c) In virtue of the acceptance the candidate must care for his vocation in a special way and foster it. He also acquires the right to the necessary spiritual assistance by which he can develop his vocation and submit unconditionally to the will of God.
2. Candidates for the permanent or transitional diaconate and for the priesthood are to receive the ministries of lector and acolyte, unless they have already done so, and are exercise them for a fitting time, in order to be better disposed for the future service of the word and of the altar.
Dispensation from the reception of these ministries on the part of such candidates is reserved to the Holy See.


3. The liturgical rites by which admission of candidates for the diaconate and the priesthood takes place and the above-mentioned ministries are conferred should be performed by the ordinary of the aspirant (the bishop and, in clerical institutes of perfection. the major superior).
4. The intervals established by the Holy See or by the episcopal conferences between the conferring--during the course of theological studies--of the ministry of lector and that of acolyte, and between the ministry of acolyte and the order of deacon must be observed.
5. Before ordination candidates for the diaconate shall give to the ordinary (the bishop and, in clerical institutes of perfection, the major superior) a declaration made out and signed in their own hand, by which they testify that they are about to receive the sacred order freely and of their own accord.
6. The special consecration of celibacy observed for the sake of the kingdom of heaven and its obligation for canddates to the priesthood and for unmarried candidates to the diaconate are indeed 'inked with the diaconate. The public commitment to holy celibacy before God and the Church is to be celebrated in a particular rite, even by religious, and it is to precede ordination to the diaconate. Celibacy taken on in this way is a diriment impediment to entering marriage In accordance with the traditional discipline of the church, a married deacon who has lost his wife cannot enter a new marriage.26
7. (a) Deacons called to the priesthood are not to be ordained until they have completed the course of studies prescribed by the norms of the Apostolic See.
(b) In regard to the course of theological studies to precede the ordination of permanent deacons, the episcopal conferences, with attention to the local situation, will issue the proper norms and submit them for the approval of the Sacred Congregation for Catholic Education.


8. In accordance with norms 29-30 of the General Instruction for the Liturgy of the Hours:
(a) deacons called to the priesthood are bound by their sacred ordination by the obligation of celebrating the liturgy of the hours;
(b) It is most fitting that permanent deacons should recite daily at least a part of the liturgy of the hours, to be determined by the episcopal conference.
9. Entrance into the clerical state and incardnation into a diocese are brought about by ordination to the diaconate.
10. The rite of admission for candidates to the diaconate and priesthood and of the special consecration of holy celibacy is to be published soon by the competent department of the Roman Curia.
Transitional Norms. Candidates for the sacrament of Orders who have already received first tonsure before the promulgation of this letter, retain all the duties, rights and privileges of clerics. Those who have been promoted to the order of subdiaconate are held to the obligations taken on in regard to both celibacy and the liturgy of the hours. But they must celebrate once again their public commitment to celibacy before God and the Church by the new special rite preceding ordination to the diaconate.
All that has been decreed by us in this letter, in moto proprio form, we order to be confirmed and ratified, anything to the contrary notwithstanding. We also determine that it shall come into force on 1 January 1973.


  1. Cf. Vatican II, dogmatic Constitution on the Church, n. 18: AAS 57 (1965), pp 21-22.
  2. Cf. Phil. 1:1.
  3. Cf. 1 Tim 3:8-13.
  4. Ad Magnesios, VI, 1: Funk, Patres Apostolici 1, p. 235.
  5. Ad Trallianos, II, 3: ibid., p 245.
  6. Ad Philippenses, V. 2: ibid., pp. 301-303.
  7. Mt. 20:26-27.
  8. Didiscalia Apostolorum III, 13, 2-4: Funk, Didiscalia et Constitutiones Apostolorum I, p. 214.
  9. Didiscalia Apostolorum II, 44, 4; ibid., p. 138.
  10. Cf. Traditio Apostolica, 39 and 34; La Tradition Apostolique de St. Hippolyte. Essai de reconstitution by B. Botte (M√ľnster, 1963), pp. 87, 91.
  11. Testamentum D.N. Iesu Christi I, 38, ed. and translated into Latin by I. E. Rahmani (Mainz, 1899), p. 93.
  12. Cf. St. Justin, Apologia I, 65, 5, and 67, 5; St. Justin, Apologiae duae, ed. G. Rauschen (Bonn, 1911), pp. 107, 111.
  13. Cf. Tertullian, De Baptismo XVII, 1: Corpus Christianorum I, Tertulliani Opera, Turnholt (1954), p. 291.
  14. Cf. Didiscalia Apostolorum II, 31, 2: Funk I, p. 112; Testamentum D.N. Iesu Christi I, 31: Rahmani, p. 75.
  15. Cf. Didiscalia Apostolorum II, 57, 6, and 58, 1: Funk I, pp. 162, 166.
  16. Cf. St. Cyprian, Epist. 15, 16 ed. G. Hartel (Vienna, 1871), pp. 513-520; cf. St. Augustine, De catechezandis rudibus I, cap. I, 1: PL 40, 309-310
  17. Session 23: Mansi, Collectio 33, 138-140.
  18. Address to the Participants in the Second International Congress of teh Lay Apostolate, 5 Oct. 1957: AAS 49 (1957), p. 925.
  19. Mt. 20:28
  20. AAS 57 (1965), p. 36.
  21. Ibid.
  22. AAS 59 (1967), pp. 697-704.
  23. AAS 60 (1968), pp. 367-373.
  24. Cf. Vatican II, Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation, n. 21: AAS 58 (1966), p. 827.
  25. Cf. Rom. 12:11-13.
  26. Cf. Paul VI, Apostolic Letter Sacrum Diaconatus Ordinem, n. 16: AAS 59 (1967), p. 701.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Definitional Dissonance

In his "statement on marriage equality" Senator Hoyer of Maryland wrote:
Because I believe that equal treatment is a central tenet of our nation, I believe that extending the definition of marriage to committed relationships between two people, irrespective of their sex, is the right thing to do and will not, in any way, undermine the institution of marriage so important to our society nor impose a threat to any individual marriage.
How could a new definition not change an institution based on the previous definition, because a new institution is to emerge from the new definition? Are they two separate institutions? Or one and the same? But they cannot be the latter, as one essential present in the original institution, sexual intercourse, cannot be present in the new definition and institution.

Sunday, April 22, 2012

So it's a puzzle... A parish in St. Paul, MN, on Sunday has the following: No Crucifix in the Sanctuary. No deacon, despite two listed in the bulletin, sort of. No penitential rite, nor no sprinkling rite ('tis Easter Season); Gloria is terminated after praising the Father; Son and Spirit remain unacknowledged. Alleluia is truncated with nonspecified verse. Gospel is proclaimed by celebrant, followed by brief homily, and no creed. Vessels are already on altar. Following Eucharistic Prayer II (of course), extraordinary ministers "take" hosts from celebrant. He receives both species as they consume. No ushers direct Communion pattern. Over in 42 minutes, including children who receive First Communion under species of bread only. Beautiful worship space; questionable liturgy.

Sunday, April 8, 2012

Easter Joy

From April, 2012, St. Joan of Arc Knights of Columbus Newsletter:
Brother Knights,
As Lent comes to a close and we enter the joyful season of Easter, celebrating the Resurrection of our Lord, perhaps  we can look back over our lives and recognize the times when the Lord was near, in both joy and sorrow.  There are the joyful times: For those of us who are parents the birth of each of our children and grandchildren  has been a great blessing, even those children who might have had health problems. For those of us who are  married, we remember that wonderful wedding day. We remember the baptism of our children and godchildren,  of nephews and nieces, of grandchildren. We recall good times with friends, perhaps in college or in the  military or as coworkers. Perhaps it is easy to see the Lord present in such joy and happiness.  And, there are the sorrowful times: the illness and loss of a spouse, parents, even children. Being laid-off or suffering  a debilitating illness ourselves, maybe an affliction that is continuing even at present. Perhaps there was  a broken marriage or betrayal by a friend or business partner. Or, there might even be sorrow at a sinful act  for which we are ashamed, even after bringing it to Confession. Can you believe that the Lord is still near at  these times and with these memories?
“The LORD is near to all who call upon him, to all who call upon him in truth,” is what the author of Psalm 145  (verse 18) wrote. As we enter the winter of our lives, we can offer these memories to the Lord, both the joys  and the sorrows. We can trust that once we confess our sins in sincerity and honesty, and do our penance, that  we are truly forgiven and the guilt is taken away. And, we can look forward to the greatest joy of Easter – our  own resurrection when the Lord comes for us at the end of time. We will be united with all our beloved family  and friends and rejoice in the great victory He won for us on Calvary and over the empty tomb.
Happy Easter!
Deacon Rex Pilger

Friday, March 2, 2012

Challenges to Life, Family, Faith

Holy Hour for Life Homily - St. Joan of Arc Catholic Church, Arvada, Colorado - February 27, 2012